The Urinator Review by Labcorp Expert Daniel Miller
Having worked at Labcorp, one of the top names in drug testing, I’ve got a bit of insider knowledge on products like the Urinator.
I’ve seen firsthand the challenges in drug testing, especially how crucial the temperature of urine is.
So, let’s dive into the Urinator. It’s marketed as an electric urine warmer, and not just any warmer.
This device stands out as the only electric option capable of keeping synthetic urine at the right temperature for an impressive 10 hours.
However, there’s a catch. In reality, the Urinator turned out to be quite bulky, and there are several concerns about its build quality.
This bulkiness isn’t just a minor inconvenience; it could be a significant hindrance, especially if you’re considering it for a drug test. The size and design increase the risk of being caught.
I’m planning to do a thorough review of the Urinator, laying out all its pros and cons. Stay tuned for an honest, detailed evaluation to help you understand exactly what this product offers.
Table of Contents
Maintaining the right temperature: It’s more crucial than you think
When it comes to drug tests using urine samples, there’s one crucial factor that often determines their success or failure: the temperature of the urine.
From my time at Labcorp, I can tell you that even a small deviation in temperature can lead to skewed results, or even render the test invalid.
The first thing a lab test collector checks is the urine’s temperature.
The acceptable range for a urine sample in drug testing is between 90 °F to 100 °F (32 °C to 38 °C). If your sample isn’t within this range, it’s a red flag for the testers, and you might be accused of attempting to cheat the test.
In such cases, you’ll be asked to provide another sample, this time under supervision.
Refusing to do so could lead to serious consequences like losing your job or having a job offer retracted.
This is where a device like the Urinator comes into play. It’s crafted to be a straightforward, user-friendly tool to help keep your urine at the right temperature during a drug test.
Unique features of the Urinator
The Urinator is equipped with several features, each designed with a specific purpose in mind.
At its core, it utilizes an electronic heating device, ensuring that the urine temperature remains warm enough for testing.
This is coupled with a computerized digital controller, which automatically regulates the urine’s temperature within the bag.
This setup is supposed to eliminate worries about maintaining the right temperature, and it’s claimed to be effective for up to 10 hours, giving you ample time for your test.
The device includes a liquid crystal thermometer attached to the urine bag for easy temperature monitoring.
However, it also comes with two additional temperature strips, which seems unnecessary and adds to the cost, considering the built-in thermometer.
Safety is a stated priority, with the manufacturer claiming that all elements are sealed to avoid electrical shorting. Despite these assurances, there are some reservations about the reliability of these safety features.
One of the device’s unique aspects is the inclusion of a thermal insulating mini-blanket and an IV bag, aimed at containing the heat comfortably and safely.
But this design choice has a trade-off, as it adds bulk to the device, compromising its discretion.
Lastly, the Urinator comes with two concentrated synthetic urine samples, indicating it’s ready for a couple of uses.
There’s also a syringe for refilling the bag with either synthetic urine or someone else’s urine, theoretically allowing for unlimited uses.
Alright, let’s break down the Urinator in a straightforward way.
First off, you need two 9V batteries for this device.
That’s an extra $7 every time you use it. Plus, these batteries are pretty bulky, which adds to the size of the device.
Then there’s the thermal insulating mini-blanket. This thing is meant to wrap around the device, but it just makes it even bulkier and harder to hide.
And here’s a kicker: there’s no stealth belt included.
So, the only place to stash this device is in your underwear, which is likely to create an awkward bulge.
Trust me, the folks who collect samples for drug tests – they’re pretty savvy to all the tricks.
A noticeable lump in your pants is going to be a dead giveaway, and they might ask you to give a sample under direct supervision because of it.
Now, let’s talk money. The Urinator sets you back $170. That’s a lot for something that’s bulky, hard to hide, and comes with the extra cost of batteries.
It’s a bit of a gamble whether it’s even usable in a real-world situation.
But wait, there’s more. The manufacturer’s website… it’s a bit of a mess.
Full of grammar mistakes and aggressive language like “idiot,” “moron,” even “blow your balls off.”
Not exactly the professional vibe you’d hope for.
The design’s outdated too – think 1990’s web vibe.
And the instructional video? It’s from 2004, blurry, and low quality.
In summary, the product and its “official” website don’t exactly inspire confidence.
My advice? Look for more reliable and safe alternatives, especially for something as important as a drug test.
Urinator versus Whizzinator: A comparative review
When comparing the Urinator and Whizzinator, there are some key differences to consider.
The Whizzinator is a synthetic urine device that includes a prosthetic. Each kit comes with a cotton elastic belt, leg straps, a choice of prosthetic color, a medical-grade pouch, heating pads, a syringe, and a synthetic urine kit.
The standout difference between the Urinator and Whizzinator is that the Urinator doesn’t have a prosthetic.
This makes the Urinator usable by both males and females, whereas the Whizzinator is designed specifically for males.
However, in reality, you might not need a prosthetic at all, as most drug tests aren’t conducted under direct observation.
In cases where they are, using something like the Whizzinator doesn’t really help, because if you’re asked to lower your pants for a directly observed test, it’s going to be pretty obvious.
The Whizzinator uses heating pads to maintain the urine temperature, but these can sometimes fail and are generally more complex to manage.
On the other hand, the Urinator uses an electric urine warmer, which is easier for temperature control. However, there are significant concerns about the Urinator’s safety, particularly regarding spillage and the risk of electrical shorts.
In terms of supply, the Urinator comes with enough synthetic urine for two uses, while the Whizzinator includes just one vial.
So, while the Urinator might seem like a better alternative to the Whizzinator, given its broader applicability and ease of temperature control, there are still considerable safety and construction concerns.
Because of these issues, I’d actually suggest looking into the Incognito Belt as a more reliable and safe option.
Urinator vs. Incognito Belt: How they stack up
Another product often compared to the Urinator is the Incognito Belt.
It’s a stealth belt that carries premixed synthetic urine discreetly around your waist.
In terms of heating, the Incognito Belt uses a heating pad, just like the Whizzinator.
The Urinator, with its electronic heating element, maintains the urine within the required range. What’s more, the Urinator is reusable, allowing you to purchase more synthetic urine for future use.
The pricing is also a point of difference. The Urinator costs $170 (batteries are bought separately), while the Incognito Belt costs $130.
When weighing your options for a drug test, the Incognito Belt really stands out, especially when you compare it to the Urinator.
The main draw for the Incognito Belt is its discretion, something that the Urinator lacks. Plus, there’s the issue of the Urinator’s website not exactly screaming ‘trustworthy’.
It’s kind of sketchy, which makes you wonder about the quality and safety of their heating element. Is it really spillproof and safe? Those are big questions.
With all this in mind, I definitely lean towards recommending the Incognito Belt. It’s got everything you need to pass a drug test with confidence.
The Urinator was supposed to be this awesome solution for keeping urine at the right temperature during drug tests. The concept of electronically controlling the temperature is smart. But the execution? Not so much. It’s bulky, not very discreet, and there are some red flags suggesting that the urine bag might leak or even cause an electrical short.
So, I can’t really get behind recommending the Urinator. Maybe future versions will iron out these issues. For now, if you’re looking for a stealthy and reliable way to pass a drug test, the Incognito Belt is the way to go.
Instructions for using the Urinator
While the Urinator is easy to use, it requires some practice. You need to be comfortable with the device before using it in a live testing situation.
The instructions are straightforward. First, use the provided syringe to fill the bag with about 75 to 85 ml of warm water for testing. If you’re conducting a live test, use warm, clean urine instead. After filling the bag, remove as much air as possible before securing the cap. Any excess air can hinder the urine heating process.
Attach the two 9-volt batteries (only Duracell is recommended), fold the insulating fabric blanket shut, and secure the Velcro ends. Once the temperature indicator on the bag reads between 98 to 100, you’re good to go.